Astro 497: Week 2, Friday
Exoplanet Detection: Transits
TableOfContents()
Logistics
How was length of lab 2?
Overview of Today
Transit Method
Observables
Transit Probability
Transit Surveys
Multiple Transiting Planet Systems
Strengths & Weaknesses
Multiple Transiting Plantes
Transit Method
Credit: NASA
Credit: Joshua Winn (2010)
Normalized Flux versus time
$$\begin{equation} f(t) = 1 + k^2 \frac{I_p(t)}{I_\star} - \begin{cases} k^2 \alpha_{\rm tra}(t) & \text{transits,} \\ 0 & \text{outside eclipses,} \\ k^2 \frac{I_p(t)}{I_\star} \alpha_{\rm occ}(t) & \text{occultations.} \end{cases} \end{equation}$$
Disk-averaged intensity of the star: $I_\star$
Disk-averaged intensity of the planet: $I_p$
Planet-star radius ratio: $k = R_p/R_\star$
Keplerian Orbit
Motion in the Orbital plane:
$$r = \frac{a(1-e^2)}{1+e\cos f}$$
Star-planet sepration: $r$
Semimajor axis: $a$
Eccentricity: $e$
True anomaly: $f$
Orbit projected onto the sky
$$\begin{eqnarray} X & = & -r \cos(\omega+f), \\ Y & = & -r \sin(\omega+f)\cos i,\\ Z & = & r \sin(\omega+f)\sin i \end{eqnarray}$$
Inclination: $i$
Arguement of pericenter: $\omega$
Longitude of ascending node: $\Omega$ (arbitrarily set to $180\degree$)
When do transits occur?
$$X^2+Y^2 \le R_\star + R_p$$
$$f_{{\rm tra}} = +\frac{\pi}{2} - \omega$$
$$f_{{\rm occ}} = -\frac{\pi}{2} - \omega$$
Transit Observables
Credit: Joshua Winn (2010)
One transit
Transit Depth: $\delta$ (dimensionless)
Impact Parameter: $b$ (units of stellar radii)
Ingress Duration: $\tau$
Transit Durations:
Total duration: $t_{IV}-t_{I}$
Full-transit duration: $t_{III}-t_{II}$
Mathematically-convenient duration: $T$
Best-measured duration: $(t_1+t_2-t_3-t_4)/2$
Impact parameter
$$b = \frac{a \cos i}{R_\star} \left(\frac{1-e^2}{1 + e\sin\omega}\right)$$
Transit depth
$$\delta \approx \left(\frac{R_p}{R_\star}\right)^2~\left[1 - \frac{I_p(t_{\rm tra})}{I_\star}\right]$$
question(md"Does the light curve of a grazing transit also reveal the planet to star radius ratio, or are full transits needed)?")
Does the light curve of a grazing transit also reveal the planet to star radius ratio, or are full transits needed)?
Limb Darkening
Credit: Figure 3 of Knutson et al. (2007)
question(md"Is there a way to correct for stellar limb darkening in light curve data?
")
Is there a way to correct for stellar limb darkening in light curve data?
See Mandell & Agol (2002) and numerous implementations (e.g., from Eric Agol and Transits.jl)
Multiple Transits
Orbital period: $P$
Epoch of $n$th transit: $t_n$
Deviations from mean values
Transit Timing Variations (TTVs): $\delta t_i$
Transit Duration Variations (TDVs): $\delta T_i$
Transit Depth Variations (TdVs): $\delta d_i$
Transit Probability
Credit: Joshua Winn (2010)
$$p_{\rm tra} = \left(\frac{R_\star \pm R_p}{a}\right) \left(\frac{1 + e\sin\omega}{1 - e^2} \right)$$
If marginalize over $\omega$:
$$p_{\rm tra} = \left(\frac{R_\star \pm R_p}{a}\right) \left(\frac{1}{1 - e^2} \right)$$
For a small planet on a circular orbit:
$$p_{\rm tra} = \frac{R_\star}{a}~\approx 0.005~\left( \frac{R_\star}{R_{\odot}} \right) \left( \frac{a}{{\rm AU}} \right)^{-1}$$
Q: Could you please explain how to derive the transit and occupation probability equations, i.e. (9) and (10), from equations (7), (8)? Do we need the assumption that a >> R, where a is the orbital semi-major axis and R is star/planet radii?
Q: Is there a limit to how far out a planet can be from its star and we still detect it by transit?
Transit Surveys
Ground-based Transit Surveys
Early Surveys
Credit: Horne 2002
Notable ground-based transit surveys
Dozens of large planets:
Small number of small planets around nearby stars:
Credit: David Anderson (CC-BY-SA-3.0 license)
question(md"What is the concept behind combining the comparison stars then dividing it from the target star, will result with a flux measurement of the eclipse with as little noise as possible?")
What is the concept behind combining the comparison stars then dividing it from the target star, will result with a flux measurement of the eclipse with as little noise as possible?
Space-based Transit Surveys
CoRoT
Kepler/K2
TESS
Plato
Kepler/K2
Credit: NASA
TESS
Credit: NASA
Plato
Copyright: Copyright: ESA/ATG medialab
question(md"Is the photometric surveys(space-based) the most economical and efficient way now?")
Is the photometric surveys(space-based) the most economical and efficient way now?
Subset | Count |
---|---|
All Exoplanets | 5084 |
Confirmed Planets Discovered by Kepler | 2708 |
Kepler Project Candidates Yet To Be Confirmed | 2056 |
Confirmed Planets Discovered by K2 | 537 |
K2 Candidates Yet To Be Confirmed | 969 |
Confirmed Planets Discovered by TESS | 249 |
TESS Project Candidates Integrated into Archive | 5845 |
Current date TESS Project Candidates at ExoFOP | 5845 |
TESS Project Candidates Yet To Be Confirmed | 3899 |
Source: Exoplanet Archive 9/2/2022
question(md"What have space-based transit survey detected so far?")
What have space-based transit survey detected so far?
Credit: Lissauer et al. 2022, submitted to AAS Journals
question(md"What is the most important thing to take away from exoplanet transits and occultations?")
What is the most important thing to take away from exoplanet transits and occultations?
Stregnths & Weaknesses
Strengths
Small telescope can do high-quality science
CCDs make relative photometry (relatively) easy
Can observe many stars at once
Not restricted to specific spectral types.
Transit signal-to-noise $\sim R_p/R_\star$
Transit probability high for short-period planets.
Weaknesses
Transits only provide information about a planet during a very small fraction of it's orbit.
Scheduling observations of a full transit can be difficult .
If observing from the ground, then day light or weather can lead to missing a transit.
Transit probability decreases with increasing orbital separation
Most planets won't transit (as seen from Earth)
Unlikely that transits can be used to study any particular planet
Other astrophysical/atmospheric objects/effects cause similar photometric effects.
Follow-up observations are often needed to validate or confirm transiting planet candidates.
Need to observe for multiple orbital periods to measure period robustly.
Resource("https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/5_ways_content/vid/transit_method_double_planet.mp4") #, :width=>"100%")
Reading Questions
question(md"""Can we use the same methods to discover exoplanets to discover moons of those exoplanets?
""")
Can we use the same methods to discover exoplanets to discover moons of those exoplanets?
question(md"""There are a lot of planets found with short periods from transiting (<10days) and a lot of these planets are Jupiter sized or larger. Is our solar system the odd one out and if we were at the closest star, is it possible that we could never find our planets using transiting considering Mercury has the shortest period of around 60 days?
""")
There are a lot of planets found with short periods from transiting (<10days) and a lot of these planets are Jupiter sized or larger. Is our solar system the odd one out and if we were at the closest star, is it possible that we could never find our planets using transiting considering Mercury has the shortest period of around 60 days?
TRAPPIST-1
Credit: NASA
Helper Code
ChooseDisplayMode()
using PlutoUI, PlutoTeachingTools
question(text) = Markdown.MD(Markdown.Admonition("tip", "Reading Question", [text]));
Built with Julia 1.8.2 and
PlutoTeachingTools 0.1.7PlutoUI 0.7.39
To run this tutorial locally, download this file and open it with Pluto.jl.
To run this tutorial locally, download this file and open it with Pluto.jl.
To run this tutorial locally, download this file and open it with Pluto.jl.
To run this tutorial locally, download this file and open it with Pluto.jl.